I was reading the Sunday Wall Street Journal page in my local paper, the Sacramento Bee. I read an article about the stock market and dollar cost averaging vs lump sum investing.
I was stunned to learn the return on investment one would have earned since the first of the year had one invested in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index.
If an investor had invested 100K on the first trading day of the new year, by the close of the market on August 5, he would have increased his investment by 2.2%
If he had dollar cost averaged – which is defined as investing a set amount each month over a set period of time – he would have done slightly better and earned 2.3%.
Am I missing something? 2.3%? 2.3 freaking percent!! Two thousand three hundred dollars over a period of seven full months. This is an acceptable return? For the possibility of losing the entire investment; with no securitization, no fail-safe, no “guarantee”? And this is an acceptable return?
Let’s compare my experience in real estate with my private lenders
(These examples are for illustration and NOT A SOLICITATION TO INVEST)
In a real estate investment with me the investment is secured by a trust deed against the property. Usually it is a first trust deed. Whether it’s a first or a second will typically relate to the amount of money invested relative to the cost of the project.
If a person is more risk averse he or she will often choose a straight interest investment. I have paid 3 points and 12% interest. If the investor is willing to take a higher risk, and by that I mean participate in the profits for a reduced interest return, then I’ve paid 2 points and 7% with a 25% share of net profits. For those that are gung ho I’ve taken equity partners where the investor puts up the funds and I get the job done and we share profits 50/50. And the great thing is that virtually every deal I do has the same three opportunities.
A concrete example: I recently had a project in Auburn (you can see it on my YouTube channel, http://youtube.com/jefffreyallendouglas, it’s titled “Gold Country Flipping).
The first investor wanted a fixed return on investment so he chose a simple interest investment. The rehab funds investor chose a profit participation. On a 28K investment they earned over $11,000!
That is not an unusual occurrence in real estate. Working with the right people there is opportunity for mom and pop investors to earn a substantial return. And unlike stocks, if the deal goes bad, the security, the property, doesn’t disappear.
So why are so many people in the stock market making a piddling return with what I would consider a higher risk? Perhaps it has something to do with the amount of advertising done to convince the small investor that the market is the only place to be?
Of course all investing has risks, but the fact is that more millionaires are created in real estate than any other investment strategy.
Let me ask you this: You’re not making money with me in real estate because…………….?


